AN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL



 

Home page

Past Issues

Pensioner's page

Newscenter

Correspondence

Credit Union

401K Plan

Powell's Book Store

Final Dispatch

Links

Disclaimer


ILWU Benefits Office

Seattle Office
Nick Buckles, Director Jefferson Square
4700 42nd Ave SW #551
Seattle, WA 98116
206.938.6720


ILWU-PMA 
Alcohol and Drug Recovery Program


COASTWISE SINGLE INDEMNITY PLAN DOCUMENT

In case you don’t know what the Coastwise Single indemnity Plan Document is, we can inform you it is the fancy name of the new Benefits Plan Document based on the awards of the 1999 contract. Its name comes from lawyers representing the ILWU and employers haggling over what language covers our benefits awards. We have not yet received copies of the document. This prolonged delay has caused our members to raise some questions. They are stated in the following letter sent to George Romero, ILWU Benefits Director:

George Romero, ILWU Benefits Director
1188 Franklin St. 4th floor
San Francisco, CA., 94109

Brother Romero:

We are writing you regarding some questions we have about the long delay in finalizing the Coastwise Single Indemnity Plan document defining the awards negotiated in the 1999 contract. Our first question is: Why do we need to depend on a group of lawyers to decide what the agreement is supposed to mean? We negotiated a contract, it stipulated the terms of the agreement, we won some concessions. In former contract agreements that settled the matter.

This looks very much to us as renegotiation by lawyers of a contract already agreed upon, and without the consent of the ILWU membership.

Question number two: The unsettled question of “lifetime benefits” has not been resolved. Are the lawyer negotiators authorized to decide this thorny question by excluding the words “life time benefits” from the document before the matter has been settled by legitimate negotiating procedure?

Question number three: Is this renegotiation of the contract by lawyers going to set a precedent? Will future contracts have to seek the approval of language lawyers before its awards are finalized? If so, the future of labor relations on the waterfront likely will end up in court if the lawyers cannot come to agreement.

This is important because future negotiations are likely to turn on benefits issues since money issues have become less contentious. Employers will regard benefits their primary concern in keeping labor costs down in view of wildly escalating health care costs.

A thing to note in all this is the statement made by Mr. Miniace when he took over as President and CEO of PMA. He stated in effect that under his administration the waterfront would see some real changes in labor relations in the next ten years brought about by “incremental steps.”

Our final question is: Is this renegotiation of benefits awards the first of Mr. Miniace’s “incremental steps”?

Signed:

Rudolph Martinez, President
Seattle Longshore Pension Club  

 
 

Home Page

Correspondence

Newscenter

Final Dispatch

Past Articles

Links

Disclaimer

Published By the Seattle ILWU-Pension Club
3440 East Marginal Way S.
Seattle, WA 98134    Phone: 206.343.0504

©2001/2008 The Rusty Hook
All Rights Reserved
Labor Donated